Chapter seven begins with the idea that internet communication has not taken the place of face-to face interactions. In my opinion it still has to a certain extent. I tend to think that it is taken for granted meaning: that perhaps some may indeed use it as a "crutch," rather than a tool for communication. It is good that we can converse nationwide however, it is bad because it makes it easier for some to not make an attempt to have/develop social skills outside the "web".
Without trying to sound contradictory of myself, there are also advantages to asynchronous, because it does allow a person to respond when they are able; for example students studying abroad or any communication that does not require an immediate response. Students within the same class may converse in this manner to complete an assignment.
School educators are not going to be able to teach every form of technology that is out there or is coming in the near future they will simply apply what is neceassary for the students to move onward into the next field. However, they do the best they can to instill within the students the technology which will be of the greatest assistance to them in the future.
When asked, do I think that instant messaging is of value in the classroom?, No, I do not because we already have computers readily available within the classrooms, if not somewhere within the school campus that are for student use at any time. Instant messaging is just a type of convience/luxury for the most part. Text messaging also allows a person to short cut using acromyms rather that writting correctly or even having to rely on a complete thought.
Podcasts again are just another form of delivering information, they do not belong in a classroom setting unless it is part of an instruction, neither do video games. If these things are being used as example to make a point or as part of a 'lecture", then by all means use them; if not do away with them til work is over. Students must relearn to use their brain to create for themselves and not simply rely on technology to do it for them. In my opinion too much technology would do the same harm as not enough.
As a parent of five children ranging in ages from six to eighteen, no I do not/will not allow my children to watch/play video games on a daily basis. Although, I do understand the points made in the article that allowing this can make them better cooordinators and also inprove brain function, I think that there are better more constructive things that can take it's place.I must insist that my children first have a clear and concise understanding of what it means to be literate and how to utilize the skills that are instilled wihin them from birth. If technology fails us one day then they will not be a part of society that is lost. My children have learned to use other resources and incorporate the new technology to work together along with outside sources. Therefore it may be a great tool but I do not see myself using this in a classroom setting unless it is required of me to do so.